Government led compulsory social insurance is against the philosophy of contract based liberalism.

Contract-based insurance goes along better with the philosophy of liberalism in comparison to national government led compulsory social insurance programs that covers, for instance, public health and labor insurance and pension. Why does liberalism not permeate Japanese people?

The legislation that imposes people to participate in compulsory insurance, such as health insurance, labor insurance and pension and car liability insurance, can be deemed to infringe people’s freedom. Is it tolerated on the utilitarian grounds or the grounds of public welfare?

健康保険や雇用保険、年金などの社会保険や自動車の自賠責保険のように国が国民に保険への加入を強制する立法で国民の自由が侵害されているにも拘らず、それが許容されているのは、功利主義的観点からですか。それとも、公共の福祉の観点からですか。